Is Creation A Viable Model Of Origins In Todayã¢â‚¬â„¢s Modern Scientific Era?ã¢â‚¬â Ken Ham Debate Youtube

Bill Nye (left) and Ken Ham debated whether creation is a feasible model of origins in the modern scientific era during a lengthy argue Tuesday. The points they raised have fueled an online conversation that continues. YouTube hide caption

toggle caption

YouTube

Beak Nye (left) and Ken Ham debated whether creation is a viable model of origins in the mod scientific era during a lengthy debate Tuesday. The points they raised have fueled an online conversation that continues.

YouTube

Days after a wide-ranging argue on creationism and evolution between Nib Nye and Ken Ham, the issue is driving an online conversation. Themes of belief and literalism, logic and faith — and, for some, relevance — are beingness aired and disputed. And some wonder what the debate accomplished.

The video of the more than than two-hour argue, in which Nye and Ham presented their views on how the Earth and its surroundings were created, has been viewed more than than 830,000 times on YouTube. At one point, the live event drew more than 500,000 viewers.

And the interest has persisted. We've sifted through some of the reactions to the debate, forth with what people make of the opposing viewpoint. Beneath is a sampling of what we're seeing:

On our live-weblog page for the debate, Richard Arthur came away with the top-rated comment (out of more than than 2,000 responses):

"As a Christian I volition say this: My faith does not require me to believe in the historic period of the earth every bit outlined in the Bible. Christ commanded me to beloved and that is where all Christians demand to focus. Discussing how many fairies can dance on the caput of a pin is a distraction."

The acme-rated response to Arthur showed signs of mutual footing and tolerance:

"And this atheist respects you lot for that," said a reader whose user name is rabidchipmnk.

In terms of who "won" the debate, the audience of Britain's Christian Today website says it was Nye, easily down. With 42,567 responses, the site's online poll finds Nye with 92 pct back up, compared with viii percent for Ham. An option for "neither" is not provided in the poll, which is nevertheless taking votes.

Christians also took Ham to task in the more than than 1,100 comments on Marking'south original mail on the morning of the debate. Hither'due south the top response, from a reader known as Slicktop Texan:

"[As] a Christian, it'southward ever amazed me how much other people of faith struggle with this. The bible is written in parables. P A R A B 50 E S. How about this: development exists, it's undeniable, evidently and simple. How can your organized religion pb you to believe that God created everything in the universe... but yet, you can't believe that perhaps evolution was how He did information technology?"

And another annotate from a user named NorthernZack asked Ham to be open to several competing theories of creation:

"Why not set up churches to present evidence for both 7-twenty-four hours Creationism and concepts of Theistic Evolution (ala the Church building of England, or the Cosmic Church, or biologos.org). Millions of Christians believe that God used evolution for cosmos. Why non let American churchgoing kids hear well-nigh multiple Christian perspectives on origins and and then make up one's mind, instead of insisting they fall lock-step into the estimation of Genesis that is to the lowest degree consequent with natural evidence."

The performances of Nye and Ham have also been judged, and critiqued. Over at The Daily Beast, Michael Schulson says that Nye's willingness to engage with Ham threatened to reduce " substantive bug to mere spectacle" — even if, equally Nye told CNN, his main goal in debating the indicate was to protect science education in America.

Ham gained publicity and legitimacy, Schulson says, while Nye "spent three-quarters of the debate sounding like a clueless geek, even if his points were scientifically valid."

Here'south how Schulson saw the ii:

"Ham was at a loss for words only once during the whole debate, when an audience member asked what it would have for him to change his mind. By dissimilarity, Nye seemed most alive when talking about all the things that he couldn't explain."

Only Ham has his ain critics — among them Pat Robertson, who said Thursday on his evidence The 700 Gild, "Allow'south be real; let's not brand a joke of ourselves."

Robertson went on to say Ham was using a flawed assay, which he linked to Ireland's Bishop Ussher, reports The Christian Mail.

Then Robertson said something that resembled points made by Nye. "Anyone who is in the oil business knows he's drilling downward, two miles, 3 miles underground, you lot're coming into all these layers that were laid downwardly by the dinosaurs," Robertson said, according to The Christian Mail. "And nosotros take skeletons of dinosaurs that get back like 65 million years. And to say that information technology all came around 6 thousand years agone is nonsense."

Saying that a cosmic Large Bang doesn't undercut his beliefs, Robertson continued, "I say God did it. God caused all of this. He is the author of all life."

If you're hungry for more discussion about life in the universe, you might want to check out Adam Frank'south contempo post for NPR'due south xiii.vii Cosmos & Civilisation weblog, titled "Eureka! First Life In The Universe."

Here's a sample:

"The idea of truly ancient 'first' civilizations is a staple in science fiction (check out the video game Mass Effect for a nice example). But when was the earliest moment in the 13.vii billion-year history of the cosmos when life (as we know it) could accept start formed?"

The answer has to practise with thoughts sparked by the Cosmic Microwave Groundwork. As Adam says, information technology'due south "a bathroom of radiation left over from merely afterwards the Big Bang (it emerges just 300,000 years after the moment of creation, which, in the scheme of things, is the blink of an centre)."

Source: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/02/06/272535141/who-won-the-creation-vs-evolution-debate

Posted by: radfordborre1967.blogspot.com

Share this post